If a child is washed, dried and changed regularly, there is no requirement for any baby powder. If you find that your baby is getting a diaper rash, then you can cover their sensitive areas with vaseline, as a barrier to defend their skin. When Jordan was a baby he was very intuitive and would remove his nappy at night, he was clean at 8-9 months during the day, and at one year of a night. He was determined not to wear them, he wished for his body to be free from any restriction. I also allowed him to be free and not to wear any at all, as much as possible during the day time.
A rash is like an open wound, and as we know, the pores open after a warm bath. As such, what you put on to the babies skin, is quickly absorbed into their system. Keep the baby as natural as you can, as they were meant to be, in more ways than one.
Talcum powder is a ground dust that 'pollutes' the air. Dust that babies can breathe in, directly on to their lungs. It has been found to co-create lung and ovarian cancer. These babies are covered in it.
TALCUM POWDER CONSPIRACY
http://academysounds.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/talcum-powder-conspiracy.html
WHITE POWDER PROPHECY.
http://academysounds.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/white-powder.html
ELIAKIM
Saturday, 12 May 2012
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Brain is not fully developed until age 24
Daily Mail report that researchers have found that the brain is not fully developed until the age of 24. That gives a lot of credence to the fact that people should get some work experience before they apply themselves to university education. Once people have had some real work place experience they are better placed to decide on an appropriate university education.
It also explains the 'boy racers' and begs the question whether children should be allowed to drive at the young age of 17?
Great Ormand Hospital have been involved in studies that began 58 years ago. It begs the question why did this not come to light in Professor Tanner's work?
1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134813/Think-youre-grown-Remarkable-new-research-suggests-young-people-dont-true-adults-theyre-24.html
It also explains the 'boy racers' and begs the question whether children should be allowed to drive at the young age of 17?
Great Ormand Hospital have been involved in studies that began 58 years ago. It begs the question why did this not come to light in Professor Tanner's work?
1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134813/Think-youre-grown-Remarkable-new-research-suggests-young-people-dont-true-adults-theyre-24.html
Thursday, 19 April 2012
US Judges Admit to Jailing Children for Money
This was just sent to me from the USA.
*******************************
This is just the tip of an awfully big iceberg that's breaking up.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: BOBWORN@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: <FearOfFlying@FeetOnTheGround.Com>
Subject: U.S. Judges Admit to Jailing Children for Money
U.S. Judges Admit to Jailing Children for Money
Posted: March 27, 2012
The Inquisitr
Philadelphia, Pa. – Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan of the Court of Common Pleas in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, plead guilty in open court that they sentenced children to juvenile detention because they were paid off to do it by the PA Childcare and a sister company, Western PA Childcare corporation that ran the private facilities.
Ciavarella wrote in a letter to the court,
“Your statement that I have disgraced my judgeship is true. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame.”
The two judges face up to seven years in prison under a plea agreement made with the state.
The companies in question paid the two judges more than $2.6 million dollars to send children to detention. The companies receive a stipend from the government for each inmate they house. So as more children were sentenced to the detention center, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare received more money from the government, prosecutors said.
According to the Juvenile Law Center, a Philadelphia nonprofit group, teenagers were sentenced to detention for simple misdemeanors.
The Constitution guarantees the right to legal representation in U.S. courts. But many of the juveniles appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney because they were told by the probation service that their minor offenses didn’t require one.
Marsha Levick, chief counsel for the Juvenile Law Center, estimated that of approximately 5,000 juveniles who came before Ciavarella from 2003 and 2006, between 1,000 and 2,000 received sentences that far outweighed their crimes. She said the center will be suing the judges and the companies to compensate the victims.
Levick said.
“That judges would allow their greed to trump the rights of defendants is just obscene,”
This nightmare scenario has long been the cry of those trying to end the practice of privatizing prisons in the United States.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/211740/u-s-judges-admit-to-jailing-children-for-money/#yejAog8QMtEhRYLx.99 <http://www.inquisitr.com/211740/u-s-judges-admit-to-jailing-children-for-money/#yejAog8QMtEhRYLx.99>
*******************************
This is just the tip of an awfully big iceberg that's breaking up.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
From: BOBWORN@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: <FearOfFlying@FeetOnTheGround.Com>
Subject: U.S. Judges Admit to Jailing Children for Money
U.S. Judges Admit to Jailing Children for Money
Posted: March 27, 2012
The Inquisitr
Philadelphia, Pa. – Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan of the Court of Common Pleas in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, plead guilty in open court that they sentenced children to juvenile detention because they were paid off to do it by the PA Childcare and a sister company, Western PA Childcare corporation that ran the private facilities.
Ciavarella wrote in a letter to the court,
“Your statement that I have disgraced my judgeship is true. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame.”
The two judges face up to seven years in prison under a plea agreement made with the state.
The companies in question paid the two judges more than $2.6 million dollars to send children to detention. The companies receive a stipend from the government for each inmate they house. So as more children were sentenced to the detention center, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare received more money from the government, prosecutors said.
According to the Juvenile Law Center, a Philadelphia nonprofit group, teenagers were sentenced to detention for simple misdemeanors.
The Constitution guarantees the right to legal representation in U.S. courts. But many of the juveniles appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney because they were told by the probation service that their minor offenses didn’t require one.
Marsha Levick, chief counsel for the Juvenile Law Center, estimated that of approximately 5,000 juveniles who came before Ciavarella from 2003 and 2006, between 1,000 and 2,000 received sentences that far outweighed their crimes. She said the center will be suing the judges and the companies to compensate the victims.
Levick said.
“That judges would allow their greed to trump the rights of defendants is just obscene,”
This nightmare scenario has long been the cry of those trying to end the practice of privatizing prisons in the United States.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/211740/u-s-judges-admit-to-jailing-children-for-money/#yejAog8QMtEhRYLx.99 <http://www.inquisitr.com/211740/u-s-judges-admit-to-jailing-children-for-money/#yejAog8QMtEhRYLx.99>
Blessed Marchella Brooklyn
Shalom,
The LORD said 'Brooklyn', so I checked the news for that location and it is dreadful story about a 4 year old child that has died weighing just 26lbs. 26 is the gematria value of the name of God.
This blessed child, Marchella died due to being 'starved, beaten and drugged to death'. This happened on Obama’s watch in 2010. The child had been in hospital from birth until she was three. Clearly her birth defects were due to her mothers drug taking.
The questions are these, should a mother that has inflicted her drug abuse on her child, be allowed to take this child home from hospital? On leaving hospital this child required the utmost love and care by those that could take care of her. Clearly, in this case, this single parent mother and the grandmother could not do so.
In this case, I would not have allowed this vulnerable child; to be put into the hands of those that do not have the inclination or maternal instincts; to look after themselves, let alone a child. In cases like this, once in medical care for that length of time, a child should stay in medical care, foster parents with medical training would have been the best option for this child when she left hospital.
Due to the history of the mother in this case, and the state of the family. The only option is adoption. Unless the mother is in serious long-term rehabilitation, and I am not just talking about being clean from drugs and drink either. The mother of Marchella required serious healing and self-development.
Everyone failed this defenceless child and her mother, the hospital, social services, neighbors and her own family.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2131525/Marchella-Brett-Pierce-Brooklyn-jury-hears-details-girl-4-starved-beaten-drugged-death.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Americans should be told about the humanitarian issues that have been going on under Obama’s nose. Nothing has changed in the African community since his watch began. In fact, those of us that know, know that it has become 100 times worst, with the black panthers putting million dollar bounties on peoples heads; and threatening to kill people. Obama cannot even inspire the African-American community to do good, let alone a country.
May the dear little soul Marchella rest in peace, and for her to know that she truly is loved in heaven.
ELIAKIM JOSEPH-SOPHIA
The LORD said 'Brooklyn', so I checked the news for that location and it is dreadful story about a 4 year old child that has died weighing just 26lbs. 26 is the gematria value of the name of God.
This blessed child, Marchella died due to being 'starved, beaten and drugged to death'. This happened on Obama’s watch in 2010. The child had been in hospital from birth until she was three. Clearly her birth defects were due to her mothers drug taking.
The questions are these, should a mother that has inflicted her drug abuse on her child, be allowed to take this child home from hospital? On leaving hospital this child required the utmost love and care by those that could take care of her. Clearly, in this case, this single parent mother and the grandmother could not do so.
In this case, I would not have allowed this vulnerable child; to be put into the hands of those that do not have the inclination or maternal instincts; to look after themselves, let alone a child. In cases like this, once in medical care for that length of time, a child should stay in medical care, foster parents with medical training would have been the best option for this child when she left hospital.
Due to the history of the mother in this case, and the state of the family. The only option is adoption. Unless the mother is in serious long-term rehabilitation, and I am not just talking about being clean from drugs and drink either. The mother of Marchella required serious healing and self-development.
Everyone failed this defenceless child and her mother, the hospital, social services, neighbors and her own family.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2131525/Marchella-Brett-Pierce-Brooklyn-jury-hears-details-girl-4-starved-beaten-drugged-death.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Americans should be told about the humanitarian issues that have been going on under Obama’s nose. Nothing has changed in the African community since his watch began. In fact, those of us that know, know that it has become 100 times worst, with the black panthers putting million dollar bounties on peoples heads; and threatening to kill people. Obama cannot even inspire the African-American community to do good, let alone a country.
May the dear little soul Marchella rest in peace, and for her to know that she truly is loved in heaven.
ELIAKIM JOSEPH-SOPHIA
Friday, 30 March 2012
University Drop-Outs UK
Today, the Daily Telegraph report that University drop-out rate soars by 13pc in a year. 13 is the Hebrew gematria value of 'Love' and 'the One'.
The issue of 'retention' is mentioned and that means that academics and universities are not inspiring the youth of today. [1]
The students of today, are used to a fast moving technological environment, and the academics simply cannot compete with it. By the time people leave university most of what they learned is already out of date. In these cases it means that going to university, and getting themselves into debt to do so, is purely a certification for a job due to the corporations requirement for graduates.
As many graduates and students stand against the corporations; what use is going to university, when most don't get employment in the subjects in which they have studied. And some don't get jobs at all.
I have said for a long time that academia requires a complete review and reform. Some subjects do not require the length of time involved and are drawn out. Some may require longer. For instance what use is it to do a psychology degree, and that degree does not qualify a person to become a psychologist? That is just one example.
People have always dropped out of university, sometimes its because they find they do not like the subject that they chose, sometimes they get offered a job prior to finishing their degrees. It is then decided to take the job and not compete with all the other graduates when they all graduate at the same time.
If a person has got talent and they're offered a real job, few turn that offer down, especially in this economic climate. If universities wish to get it right, then some in-depth research is required to be done with the students that left in their first year.
Many are also rejecting the sausage machine that impacts on their consciousness and how they respond to life experience.
1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9173784/University-drop-out-rate-soars-by-13pc-in-a-year.html
The issue of 'retention' is mentioned and that means that academics and universities are not inspiring the youth of today. [1]
The students of today, are used to a fast moving technological environment, and the academics simply cannot compete with it. By the time people leave university most of what they learned is already out of date. In these cases it means that going to university, and getting themselves into debt to do so, is purely a certification for a job due to the corporations requirement for graduates.
As many graduates and students stand against the corporations; what use is going to university, when most don't get employment in the subjects in which they have studied. And some don't get jobs at all.
I have said for a long time that academia requires a complete review and reform. Some subjects do not require the length of time involved and are drawn out. Some may require longer. For instance what use is it to do a psychology degree, and that degree does not qualify a person to become a psychologist? That is just one example.
People have always dropped out of university, sometimes its because they find they do not like the subject that they chose, sometimes they get offered a job prior to finishing their degrees. It is then decided to take the job and not compete with all the other graduates when they all graduate at the same time.
If a person has got talent and they're offered a real job, few turn that offer down, especially in this economic climate. If universities wish to get it right, then some in-depth research is required to be done with the students that left in their first year.
Many are also rejecting the sausage machine that impacts on their consciousness and how they respond to life experience.
1. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9173784/University-drop-out-rate-soars-by-13pc-in-a-year.html
Thursday, 29 March 2012
NYC Schools BAN words of God
Fox News have reported on the fact that NYC schools in the USA have been instructed to ban words like 'Birthday', 'Dancing', 'Dinosaur'. Now in 2008, God said that the 'USA is a dinosaur', as such NYC education department are standing against the words of God. Other words that they have banned are 'slavery', 'terrorism'. These words appear in the bible; as such the education department is standing against the bible as well.
Fox News state that the Liberal Democrats are creating 'gaps' in education. Well they're doing a lot more than that, they are removing what is important for children to understand. Creation evolves and evolution creates. One cannot pander to every different ideology and makes change to suit them. However, I am aware that the bible predicts a new language, but it will not be the kind of language that adult Lib Dems use.
It really is time for Christians to consider the vast implications of what is going on globally and how that is impacting on Christians and their future. The past creates the present and the present creates the future. The decisions that Christians make now will be long-ranging and vast implications. They have a choice to allow their demise to be enforced gradually, or to arise to align their will with the will of the LORD God.
Can you even imagine a Western land where there are no Church bells, no white weddings, no Christenings, no Church funerals? If you would like to discuss 'Is there a future for Christianity and what form will it take?' Please do not hesitate to skype me on ELIAKIMJOSEPHSOPHIA@skype.com
1. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/28/NYC-Schools
Fox News state that the Liberal Democrats are creating 'gaps' in education. Well they're doing a lot more than that, they are removing what is important for children to understand. Creation evolves and evolution creates. One cannot pander to every different ideology and makes change to suit them. However, I am aware that the bible predicts a new language, but it will not be the kind of language that adult Lib Dems use.
It really is time for Christians to consider the vast implications of what is going on globally and how that is impacting on Christians and their future. The past creates the present and the present creates the future. The decisions that Christians make now will be long-ranging and vast implications. They have a choice to allow their demise to be enforced gradually, or to arise to align their will with the will of the LORD God.
Can you even imagine a Western land where there are no Church bells, no white weddings, no Christenings, no Church funerals? If you would like to discuss 'Is there a future for Christianity and what form will it take?' Please do not hesitate to skype me on ELIAKIMJOSEPHSOPHIA@skype.com
1. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/28/NYC-Schools
Friday, 17 February 2012
RAT eating American Children
Thanks to Obama and the Obama supporters that supported Obama instead of the divine plan, children are now eating rats in the USA. We warned the people about the rats and the cultural genocide in January 2008. Did they return? No! Teshuvah USA, teshuvah.
So what does the bible have to say about such things?
"Make models of the tumors and of the rats that are destroying the country, and give glory to Israel’s elohiym. Perhaps he will lift his hand from you and your elohiym and your land. I Samuel 6:5"
As we know the USA called Obama the Messiah and exalted him, and the world fell at his feet and gave him the noble peace prize. We all know what came prior to it, and what followed it. The next passage of Samuel tells the people not to harden their hearts like the Egyptians and the Pharaoh. The LORD called Obama the Pharaoh in November 2008.
“Those who consecrate and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one who is among those who eat the flesh of pigs, rats and other unclean things—they will meet their end together with the one they follow,” declares the LORD. Isaiah 66:17
Teshuvah USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
